xJawn NHL expected goals

← Games

Save a card: Summary · Full card · Game flow · VGK skaters · CBJ skaters · VGK lines · CBJ lines · Matchups
Final / OT · Oct 24, 2026
2026-27 · regular season
The call
VGK 51.3% ✗
expected 2.87–2.80 · CBJ won 1–2 in OT
actual xG
3.08–2.04
xG share, predicted → actual
VGK 51% → 60%49% → 40% CBJ
Today's puzzle Remember Some Guys — name the skater from the shape of his career. Three clues, one guess a day. Play →
Adjusts with rink filters

Strength and score are read from VGK's side, the same minutes at both ends: PP = VGK power play · PK = CBJ power play · Leading = VGK ahead · ST = each club's own power play.

VGK attacks◀ all strengths
CBJ attacksall strengths ▶
× goal• on net ◦ missed· blocked hover any attempt for the shooter, its xG and everything the model saw
How to read this map

One rink, both teams: VGK attacks the left net, CBJ the right. Every attempt is a Gaussian bump of height = its model xG. The controls switch the surface (xG heatmap ↔ vs league) and the markers; vs league compares this game against a typical NHL team-game under the same filter (2026-27 regular season, 176 games), so a 5v5 view is measured against league 5v5.

A strength or score filter is read from VGK's side and mirrored for CBJ: “VGK PP” shows VGK's power-play attempts on the left and CBJ's shorthanded attempts on the right — the same minutes of the game at both ends. Empty-net attempts are excluded unless you include them. The Player control narrows the map and the rows beneath it to the attempts by either club while one player was on the ice (for a goalie, while he was in net); his own attempts wear a blue ring. vs league switches off while a player is picked — the league baseline is a whole team-game, which one player's slice is not. Hover any attempt for the shooter, the result, its xG, and the inputs behind it: clock, strength, score, shot type, distance, angle, handedness, rush/rebound, what happened just before, and the goalie or the blocker.

What each side produced

all strengths · regular season
VGK CBJ
bars share a scale within each row · the longer bar is the row's leader
Goalson the map
1 2
Expected goals
3.08 2.04
xG%share of xG
60% 40%
High-dangerattempts ≥ 0.20 xG
3 1
Shots on goal
27 20
Attempts
51 55
xG by period · whole game 1st1.2–0.52nd0.5–0.73rd1.4–0.4OT0.0–0.4

The Blue Jackets beat the Golden Knights 2–1 in overtime at home despite being out-created 3.1–2.0 in expected goals. That is a finishing-and-goaltending win. At 5v5: VGK 2.8, CBJ 1.5.

Counts come from the shot table behind the map: empty-net attempts and the shootout are excluded, so the goals here can trail the official final by an empty-netter or the shootout's deciding goal. Same numbers as the post-game cards.

As the game went

cumulative VGK − CBJ xG · bands = power plays · lines = goals
1ST2ND3RDOT+0.5−0.5+1−1+1.5−1.5VGK AHEAD ▲CBJ AHEAD ▼
How to read this

One line: cumulative VGK minus CBJ expected goals. Above zero VGK is ahead on chances, below zero CBJ is. Shaded bands are power plays in the side's colour; vertical lines are goals.

Skaters

on-ice xG · sorted by net · one game
How to read this

Every skater, sorted by net on-ice expected goals: on-ice xG against to the left of zero, for to the right, his own attempts as the solid bar, a hash at the net. The slim track under the name is ice time.

VGK
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.50Trevor ConnellyF16:28+1.46Noah HanifinD19:02+1.00Dylan CoghlanD15:47+0.96Braeden BowmanF16:36+0.94Tomas HertlF12:55+0.89Jack EichelF21:43+0.60Mark StoneF20:21+0.54Shea TheodoreD24:35+0.51Brayden McNabbD23:27+0.37Marc GatcombF11:58+0.13Raphael LavoieF10:16+0.12Nic DowdF10:48+0.11Ivan BarbashevF15:22-0.04Rasmus AnderssonD19:35-0.16Brett HowdenF15:24-0.19Alexander HoltzF9:29-0.22William KarlssonF16:48-0.47Jeremy LauzonD18:23-0.53
CBJ
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.50Charlie CoyleF19:26+0.25Damon SeversonD25:47+0.04Zach WerenskiD28:15-0.03Ryan LombergF7:49-0.09Luca Del Bel BelluzF7:30-0.12Dmitri VoronkovF6:42-0.12Mathieu OlivierF16:39-0.19Kent JohnsonF17:47-0.20Denton MateychukD21:39-0.32Matthew KniesF19:09-0.40Valeri NichushkinF17:13-0.42Sean MonahanF18:16-0.42Conor GarlandF17:03-0.44Cole SillingerF16:06-0.48Jake ChristiansenD18:24-0.50Adam FantilliF19:10-0.64Erik GudbransonD12:21-0.74Carson SoucyD12:25-0.87

Lines & pairs

most-used 5v5 units · when they played · on-ice xG
How to read this

The forward lines and defence pairs that actually played together most at 5v5, each with when it was on the ice across the game clock (period and power-play bands behind the strip) and on-ice xG against/for while the whole unit was out.

VGK
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
FORWARD LINESL1Mark StoneIvan BarbashevJack Eichel8:32-0.14L2Nic DowdRaphael LavoieMarc Gatcomb7:39+0.12L3Tomas HertlBraeden BowmanTrevor Connelly6:49+0.82L4William KarlssonBrett HowdenAlexander Holtz6:31-0.38DEFENCE PAIRSD1Brayden McNabbShea Theodore21:35+0.60D2Rasmus AnderssonJeremy Lauzon15:27-0.24D3Noah HanifinDylan Coghlan14:24+0.961ST2ND3RDOT01.251.25
CBJ
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
FORWARD LINESL1Charlie CoyleMathieu OlivierMatthew Knies13:13-0.09L2Valeri NichushkinKent JohnsonAdam Fantilli12:52-0.44L3Sean MonahanConor GarlandCole Sillinger12:19-0.33L4Ryan LombergDmitri VoronkovLuca Del Bel Belluz6:29-0.12DEFENCE PAIRSD1Damon SeversonZach Werenski18:55-0.19D2Jake ChristiansenDenton Mateychuk10:35-0.52D3Erik GudbransonCarson Soucy10:19-0.851ST2ND3RDOT01.251.25

Matchups

5v5 · every skater against every skater, goalies first · hover a cell
VGK won the chances CBJ won them full colour = a margin of 0.75 xG or more taller = more time together (full height at 12:00) on together, dead even never on together G = goalie: his row or column is each skater against the whole other team
HartStoneBarbashevEichelDowdLavoieGatcombHertlBowmanConnellyKarlssonHowdenHoltzMcNabbTheodoreAnderssonLauzonHanifinCoghlanTalbotCoyleOlivierKniesNichushkinJohnsonFantilliMonahanGarlandSillingerLombergVoronkovDel Bel BelluzSeversonWerenskiChristiansenMateychukGudbransonSoucyGL1L2L3L4D1D2D3GL1L2L3L4D1D2D3
How to read this

Rows are VGK's skaters, columns CBJ's, grouped the way they played: forward lines (L1 = the line that played together most), then defence pairs. Each cell covers the five-on-five time those two players shared the ice. Its colour is the club that out-chanced the other in that time — expected goals for minus against — and the stronger the colour, the bigger the margin. Each cell is also raised: the taller the block, the longer the two shared the ice, up to full height at 12:00 of five-on-five time. A grey cell means they met and it came out even; an open, flat one means they never met at five-on-five.

The first row and column are the goalies. A goalie is in net for every five-on-five second, so a skater's cell against the other side's goalie is all of that skater's five-on-five time against that team — the rest of his row or column added up — and the corner where the two goalies meet is the game's five-on-five. Those cells cover far more time than any pair, so they reach full colour sooner and stand at full height, a wall along each edge of the grid. A goalie change adds a second goalie row or column, each covering his own time.

Linemates share the ice, so a line against a line reads as a block. The margin is a total, not a rate: a long matchup has room to build a big gap and a thirty-second one does not — which is what the height is there to show: a tall, strong cell is the game's story; a short, strong one is a moment. Hover (or tap) any cell for the exact time together, the xG each way, attempts and goals. One game — a strong cell is what happened, not what would happen again.

Goals

xG = the chance, before it went in
TeamScorerPeriodTimexG
VGKTomas Hertl 1st17:13 0.51
CBJDenton Mateychuk 1st11:51 0.31
CBJAdam Fantilli OT0:59 PP 0.10

The prediction, scored

Before puck drop the engine made VGK a 51.3% favorite, expecting a 2.87–2.80 game — CBJ won 1–2, so the call missed. Every number in this section was issued before the game and is never re-graded.

pred. xGactual xG pred. 5v5actual 5v5 pred. STactual PP
VGK 2.873.08 1.892.82 0.820.09
CBJ 2.802.04 2.071.45 0.470.43

Predicted 5v5 / special-teams portions come from the predicted map's strength splits (one shared scale per team pins the all-strengths total to its expected goals), so they don't sum exactly — the remainder is 4v4, 3v3, and other mixed states. The actual columns are the card's own counts (empty-net attempts excluded); the actual PP column is power-play xG only, the same bucket the predicted map's special-teams view draws.

The pregame score grid

The likeliest finals the engine saw before the game, with what actually happened marked — ■ VGK · ■ CBJ.

Likeliest finals (VGK–CBJ)probability
2–2 7.9% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
3–3 7.1% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
4–2 4.0%
3–1 4.0%
1–1 3.9% what happened — regulation ended tied; CBJ won in OT
5.7%6.1%016.3%17.1%123.2%23.7%222.1%22.0%316.0%15.5%49.3%8.8%54.5%4.2%61.9%1.7%71.0%0.8%8+

Scoreline odds are the engine's own grid: each team's goals as a Poisson count, with the fitted adjustment for how often games end tied after regulation (ρ = 0.35), so these odds and the headline win probability come from the same numbers. The OT/SO layer is a separate fitted model and is already inside the headline win probability.

The pregame read

The engine made VGK a 51.3% favorite — CBJ controls 49.4% of the predicted xG. Of VGK's 2.87 expected goals, 1.89 should come at 5v5 and 0.82 on the power play; CBJ projects 2.07 at 5v5 and 0.47 on the power play. The logistic challenger put the home side at 45.4%, Elo at 50.5%.

Why VGK 51.3%
win chance× expected goals
5v5 play +6.1 VGK ×1.01 · CBJ ×0.90
home ice −3.4 VGK ×1.00 · CBJ ×1.08
goaltending −2.9 VGK ×0.95 · CBJ ×1.01
special teams +1.0 VGK ×1.00 · CBJ ×0.98
finishing +0.6 VGK ×1.03 · CBJ ×1.02
schedule +0.3 VGK ×1.01 · CBJ ×1.00

Win chance is in points toward VGK (bars right of the line push toward VGK, left toward CBJ). Each win-chance number is one-at-a-time: that piece reset to league average (neutral ice, a typical night's rest) on both sides and the game re-priced; the pieces interact, so they don't add up to the call. The multipliers are exact: a league-average team on neutral ice, on a typical night's rest, would expect 2.88 goals in this game, and each side's expected goals is that times its column of multipliers. Special teams reads small because the engine's power-play terms fit near zero, not because special teams don't matter.

Where the engine expected the goals

The predicted surface, issued before puck drop — not this game's shots (those are the card's map above). VGK attacks the left net, CBJ the right; each end multiplies where the attacking team generates xG this season by where its opponent concedes it, scaled so each end totals the engine's expected goals. Actual shots lays the game's unblocked attempts on top: × goals, • on net, ◦ missed.

Tale of the tape

How each team fares on its own, season to date: per-game xG rates with league rank (of 32). Rank 1 is best on every row — orange ranks sit in the top third of the league, gray in the bottom third.

VGKCBJ
3.32 (6th) Offense
xG for / game
2.59 (28th)
2.45 (4th) Defense
xG against / game
3.23 (26th)
0.81 (11th) Power play
PP xG / game
0.60 (26th)
0.34 (1st) Penalty kill
PP xG conceded / game
0.93 (29th)

Season-to-date form as of the site's latest build, shown for context — the ratings the engine actually used were its own as-of-game-day state. Replay this matchup in the lab →