xJawn NHL expected goals

← Games

Save a card: Summary · Full card · Game flow · NYR skaters · OTT skaters · NYR lines · OTT lines · Matchups

NYR 4 – 7 OTT

New York Rangers at Ottawa Senators

Final · Oct 24, 2026
2026-27 · regular season
The call
OTT 54.9% ✓
expected 2.75–3.01 · OTT won 4–7
actual xG
3.57–3.05
xG share, predicted → actual
NYR 48% → 54%52% → 46% OTT
Today's puzzle Remember Some Guys — name the skater from the shape of his career. Three clues, one guess a day. Play →
Adjusts with rink filters

Strength and score are read from NYR's side, the same minutes at both ends: PP = NYR power play · PK = OTT power play · Leading = NYR ahead · ST = each club's own power play.

NYR attacks◀ all strengths
OTT attacksall strengths ▶
× goal• on net ◦ missed· blocked hover any attempt for the shooter, its xG and everything the model saw
How to read this map

One rink, both teams: NYR attacks the left net, OTT the right. Every attempt is a Gaussian bump of height = its model xG. The controls switch the surface (xG heatmap ↔ vs league) and the markers; vs league compares this game against a typical NHL team-game under the same filter (2026-27 regular season, 176 games), so a 5v5 view is measured against league 5v5.

A strength or score filter is read from NYR's side and mirrored for OTT: “NYR PP” shows NYR's power-play attempts on the left and OTT's shorthanded attempts on the right — the same minutes of the game at both ends. Empty-net attempts are excluded unless you include them. The Player control narrows the map and the rows beneath it to the attempts by either club while one player was on the ice (for a goalie, while he was in net); his own attempts wear a blue ring. vs league switches off while a player is picked — the league baseline is a whole team-game, which one player's slice is not. Hover any attempt for the shooter, the result, its xG, and the inputs behind it: clock, strength, score, shot type, distance, angle, handedness, rush/rebound, what happened just before, and the goalie or the blocker.

What each side produced

all strengths · regular season
NYR OTT
bars share a scale within each row · the longer bar is the row's leader
Goalson the map
4 5
Expected goals
3.57 3.05
xG%share of xG
54% 46%
High-dangerattempts ≥ 0.20 xG
2 5
Shots on goal
28 22
Attempts
67 47
xG by period · whole game 1st0.9–0.72nd1.6–1.53rd1.1–0.9

The Senators beat the Rangers 7–4 at home in a game the chances called about even, NYR 3.6 to OTT 3.1 in expected goals. At 5v5: NYR 2.3, OTT 2.4.

Counts come from the shot table behind the map: empty-net attempts and the shootout are excluded, so the goals here can trail the official final by an empty-netter or the shootout's deciding goal. Same numbers as the post-game cards.

As the game went

cumulative NYR − OTT xG · bands = power plays · lines = goals
1ST2ND3RD+0.5−0.5+1−1NYR AHEAD ▲OTT AHEAD ▼
How to read this

One line: cumulative NYR minus OTT expected goals. Above zero NYR is ahead on chances, below zero OTT is. Shaded bands are power plays in the side's colour; vertical lines are goals.

Skaters

on-ice xG · sorted by net · one game
How to read this

Every skater, sorted by net on-ice expected goals: on-ice xG against to the left of zero, for to the right, his own attempts as the solid bar, a hash at the net. The slim track under the name is ice time.

NYR
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5222.52.50J.T. MillerF18:48+1.50Adam FoxD23:09+1.49Alexis LafrenièreF18:42+1.28Mika ZibanejadF19:35+1.21Gabe PerreaultF14:54+0.40Taylor RaddyshF5:55+0.33Tye KartyeF16:04+0.30Sean DurziD20:49+0.15Pavel DorofeyevF19:04+0.09Oliver BjorkstrandF11:11-0.02Vladislav GavrikovD20:36-0.06Marcus PetterssonD23:01-0.06Luke GlendeningF6:08-0.19Eeli TolvanenF10:59-0.32Alberts SmitsD13:27-0.32Will CuylleF19:32-0.73Noah LabaF17:15-1.08Braden SchneiderD15:13-1.12
OTT
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5220Claude GirouxF16:19+0.65Tim StützleF20:35+0.39Fabian ZetterlundF17:17+0.29Stephen HallidayF6:25+0.22Drake BathersonF15:30+0.17Tyler KlevenD21:48+0.16Dylan CozensF17:15+0.10Carter YakemchukD17:07-0.03Nick CousinsF8:34-0.10Andre BurakovskyF10:28-0.11Jordan SpenceD19:17-0.12Artem ZubD18:23-0.29Shane PintoF19:12-0.32Jake SandersonD22:25-0.33Warren FoegeleF12:49-0.36Michael AmadioF17:13-0.56Nikolas MatinpaloD16:26-0.66Ridly GreigF18:09-0.90

Lines & pairs

most-used 5v5 units · when they played · on-ice xG
How to read this

The forward lines and defence pairs that actually played together most at 5v5, each with when it was on the ice across the game clock (period and power-play bands behind the strip) and on-ice xG against/for while the whole unit was out.

NYR
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
FORWARD LINESL1Mika ZibanejadAlexis LafrenièreGabe Perreault11:08+0.49L2Pavel DorofeyevWill CuylleNoah Laba7:02-0.46L3J.T. MillerOliver BjorkstrandTye Kartye5:41+0.63L4Luke GlendeningTaylor RaddyshEeli Tolvanen2:01+0.36DEFENCE PAIRSD1Marcus PetterssonSean Durzi18:27+0.05D2Vladislav GavrikovAdam Fox15:37+0.82D3Braden SchneiderAlberts Smits10:49-0.261ST2ND3RD01.251.25
OTT
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
FORWARD LINESL1Claude GirouxFabian ZetterlundTim Stützle11:20+0.59L2Michael AmadioShane PintoRidly Greig11:20+0.18L3Warren FoegeleDrake BathersonDylan Cozens7:42+0.03L4Nick CousinsAndre BurakovskyStephen Halliday4:13+0.12DEFENCE PAIRSD1Jordan SpenceTyler Kleven16:16-0.03D2Jake SandersonArtem Zub14:16-0.23D3Nikolas MatinpaloCarter Yakemchuk9:23-0.391ST2ND3RD011

Matchups

5v5 · every skater against every skater, goalies first · hover a cell
NYR won the chances OTT won them full colour = a margin of 0.75 xG or more taller = more time together (full height at 12:00) on together, dead even never on together G = goalie: his row or column is each skater against the whole other team
GarandZibanejadLafrenièrePerreaultDorofeyevCuylleLabaMillerBjorkstrandKartyeGlendeningRaddyshTolvanenPetterssonDurziGavrikovFoxSchneiderSmitsJohanssonGirouxZetterlundStützleAmadioPintoGreigFoegeleBathersonCozensCousinsBurakovskyHallidaySpenceKlevenSandersonZubMatinpaloYakemchukGL1L2L3L4D1D2D3GL1L2L3L4D1D2D3
How to read this

Rows are NYR's skaters, columns OTT's, grouped the way they played: forward lines (L1 = the line that played together most), then defence pairs. Each cell covers the five-on-five time those two players shared the ice. Its colour is the club that out-chanced the other in that time — expected goals for minus against — and the stronger the colour, the bigger the margin. Each cell is also raised: the taller the block, the longer the two shared the ice, up to full height at 12:00 of five-on-five time. A grey cell means they met and it came out even; an open, flat one means they never met at five-on-five.

The first row and column are the goalies. A goalie is in net for every five-on-five second, so a skater's cell against the other side's goalie is all of that skater's five-on-five time against that team — the rest of his row or column added up — and the corner where the two goalies meet is the game's five-on-five. Those cells cover far more time than any pair, so they reach full colour sooner and stand at full height, a wall along each edge of the grid. A goalie change adds a second goalie row or column, each covering his own time.

Linemates share the ice, so a line against a line reads as a block. The margin is a total, not a rate: a long matchup has room to build a big gap and a thirty-second one does not — which is what the height is there to show: a tall, strong cell is the game's story; a short, strong one is a moment. Hover (or tap) any cell for the exact time together, the xG each way, attempts and goals. One game — a strong cell is what happened, not what would happen again.

Goals

xG = the chance, before it went in
TeamScorerPeriodTimexG
NYRWill Cuylle 2nd10:07 SH 0.19
NYRJ.T. Miller 2nd12:54 0.21
NYRAlexis Lafrenière 2nd19:34 0.10
NYRPavel Dorofeyev 3rd15:32 0.03
OTTDrake Batherson 1st5:34 0.05
OTTTim Stützle 1st6:40 0.21
OTTDrake Batherson 2nd1:47 0.25
OTTDylan Cozens 2nd11:21 0.19
OTTJake Sanderson 3rd13:38 0.39
OTTMichael Amadio 3rd18:47 EN 0.41
OTTDrake Batherson 3rd19:48 EN 0.44

The prediction, scored

Before puck drop the engine made OTT a 54.9% favorite, expecting a 2.75–3.01 game — OTT won 4–7, so the call landed. Every number in this section was issued before the game and is never re-graded.

pred. xGactual xG pred. 5v5actual 5v5 pred. STactual PP
NYR 2.753.57 1.902.26 0.720.78
OTT 3.013.05 2.092.40 0.830.63

Predicted 5v5 / special-teams portions come from the predicted map's strength splits (one shared scale per team pins the all-strengths total to its expected goals), so they don't sum exactly — the remainder is 4v4, 3v3, and other mixed states. The actual columns are the card's own counts (empty-net attempts excluded); the actual PP column is power-play xG only, the same bucket the predicted map's special-teams view draws.

The pregame score grid

The likeliest finals the engine saw before the game, with what actually happened marked — ■ NYR · ■ OTT.

Likeliest finals (NYR–OTT)probability
2–2 7.7% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
3–3 7.1% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
2–4 4.3%
1–3 4.1%
1–1 3.7% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
4–7 0.4% what happened
6.5%5.0%017.7%14.9%124.1%22.2%221.9%22.1%315.1%16.8%48.4%10.3%53.9%5.2%61.6%2.3%70.8%1.2%8+

Scoreline odds are the engine's own grid: each team's goals as a Poisson count, with the fitted adjustment for how often games end tied after regulation (ρ = 0.35), so these odds and the headline win probability come from the same numbers. The OT/SO layer is a separate fitted model and is already inside the headline win probability.

The pregame read

The engine made OTT a 54.9% favorite — OTT controls 52.2% of the predicted xG. Of NYR's 2.75 expected goals, 1.90 should come at 5v5 and 0.72 on the power play; OTT projects 2.09 at 5v5 and 0.83 on the power play. The logistic challenger put the home side at 56.7%, Elo at 59.6%.

Why OTT 54.9%
win chance× expected goals
5v5 play +5.5 OTT ×1.00 · NYR ×0.90
finishing −3.8 OTT ×0.98 · NYR ×1.07
home ice +3.5 OTT ×1.08 · NYR ×1.00
goaltending −2.0 OTT ×0.95 · NYR ×0.99
special teams +1.4 OTT ×1.03 · NYR ×0.99
schedule +0.0 OTT ×1.00 · NYR ×1.00

Win chance is in points toward OTT (bars right of the line push toward OTT, left toward NYR). Each win-chance number is one-at-a-time: that piece reset to league average (neutral ice, a typical night's rest) on both sides and the game re-priced; the pieces interact, so they don't add up to the call. The multipliers are exact: a league-average team on neutral ice, on a typical night's rest, would expect 2.88 goals in this game, and each side's expected goals is that times its column of multipliers. Special teams reads small because the engine's power-play terms fit near zero, not because special teams don't matter.

Where the engine expected the goals

The predicted surface, issued before puck drop — not this game's shots (those are the card's map above). NYR attacks the left net, OTT the right; each end multiplies where the attacking team generates xG this season by where its opponent concedes it, scaled so each end totals the engine's expected goals. Actual shots lays the game's unblocked attempts on top: × goals, • on net, ◦ missed.

Tale of the tape

How each team fares on its own, season to date: per-game xG rates with league rank (of 32). Rank 1 is best on every row — orange ranks sit in the top third of the league, gray in the bottom third.

NYROTT
2.91 (17th) Offense
xG for / game
2.89 (20th)
2.67 (9th) Defense
xG against / game
2.71 (10th)
0.69 (20th) Power play
PP xG / game
0.93 (4th)
0.61 (8th) Penalty kill
PP xG conceded / game
0.75 (18th)

Season-to-date form as of the site's latest build, shown for context — the ratings the engine actually used were its own as-of-game-day state. Replay this matchup in the lab →