xJawn NHL expected goals

← Games

Save a card: Summary · Full card · Game flow · PHI skaters · BOS skaters · PHI lines · BOS lines · Matchups

PHI 1 – 5 BOS

Philadelphia Flyers at Boston Bruins

Final · Oct 10, 2026
2026-27 · regular season
The call
BOS 57.6% ✓
expected 2.60–3.06 · BOS won 1–5
actual xG
1.14–3.13
xG share, predicted → actual
PHI 46% → 27%54% → 73% BOS
Today's puzzle Remember Some Guys — name the skater from the shape of his career. Three clues, one guess a day. Play →
Adjusts with rink filters

Strength and score are read from PHI's side, the same minutes at both ends: PP = PHI power play · PK = BOS power play · Leading = PHI ahead · ST = each club's own power play.

PHI attacks◀ all strengths
BOS attacksall strengths ▶
× goal• on net ◦ missed· blocked hover any attempt for the shooter, its xG and everything the model saw
How to read this map

One rink, both teams: PHI attacks the left net, BOS the right. Every attempt is a Gaussian bump of height = its model xG. The controls switch the surface (xG heatmap ↔ vs league) and the markers; vs league compares this game against a typical NHL team-game under the same filter (2025-26 regular season, 1312 games), so a 5v5 view is measured against league 5v5.

A strength or score filter is read from PHI's side and mirrored for BOS: “PHI PP” shows PHI's power-play attempts on the left and BOS's shorthanded attempts on the right — the same minutes of the game at both ends. Empty-net attempts are excluded unless you include them. The Player control narrows the map and the rows beneath it to the attempts by either club while one player was on the ice (for a goalie, while he was in net); his own attempts wear a blue ring. vs league switches off while a player is picked — the league baseline is a whole team-game, which one player's slice is not. Hover any attempt for the shooter, the result, its xG, and the inputs behind it: clock, strength, score, shot type, distance, angle, handedness, rush/rebound, what happened just before, and the goalie or the blocker.

What each side produced

all strengths · regular season
PHI BOS
bars share a scale within each row · the longer bar is the row's leader
Goalson the map
1 5
Expected goals
1.14 3.14
xG%share of xG
27% 73%
High-dangerattempts ≥ 0.20 xG
0 1
Shots on goal
15 32
Attempts
37 64
xG by period · whole game 1st0.4–0.92nd0.4–0.83rd0.4–1.4

The Bruins beat the Flyers 5–1 at home, and the chances agreed: BOS out-created PHI 3.1–1.1 in expected goals. At 5v5: PHI 0.9, BOS 3.0.

Counts come from the shot table behind the map: empty-net attempts and the shootout are excluded, so the goals here can trail the official final by an empty-netter or the shootout's deciding goal. Same numbers as the post-game cards.

As the game went

cumulative PHI − BOS xG · bands = power plays · lines = goals
1ST2ND3RD+0.5−0.5+1−1+1.5−1.5+2−2PHI AHEAD ▲BOS AHEAD ▼
How to read this

One line: cumulative PHI minus BOS expected goals. Above zero PHI is ahead on chances, below zero BOS is. Shaded bands are power plays in the side's colour; vertical lines are goals.

Skaters

on-ice xG · sorted by net · one game
How to read this

Every skater, sorted by net on-ice expected goals: on-ice xG against to the left of zero, for to the right, his own attempts as the solid bar, a hash at the net. The slim track under the name is ice time.

PHI
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.50Porter MartoneF14:29+0.26Noah CatesF9:56+0.11Michael BuntingF13:36-0.10Garrett WilsonF10:27-0.43Denver BarkeyF12:52-0.44Trevor ZegrasF15:07-0.44Sean CouturierF15:12-0.46Nick SeelerD18:52-0.47Noel AcciariF11:22-0.49Jamie DrysdaleD23:05-0.63Helge GransD12:13-0.63Owen TippettF14:50-0.64Simon BenoitD13:22-0.74David JiricekD16:29-0.76Travis SanheimD26:48-0.80Matvei MichkovF14:43-0.91Christian DvorakF17:25-1.00Tyson FoersterF16:00-1.17
BOS
against for own net ice time
0.50.5110Casey MittelstadtF12:21+1.02James HagensF12:26+1.00Elias LindholmF12:43+0.94Connor CliftonD20:46+0.81Morgan GeekieF16:28+0.73JJ PeterkaF13:17+0.73Pavel ZachaF18:58+0.72Nikita ZadorovD20:16+0.71Mason LohreiD16:19+0.71David PastrnakF19:29+0.68Fraser MintenF13:41+0.67Frederic BrunetD17:28+0.64Marat KhusnutdinovF13:00+0.61William BorgenD17:36+0.55Hampus LindholmD17:45+0.50Tanner JeannotF11:31-0.33Mark KastelicF10:30-0.33Matthew PoitrasF11:35-0.37

Lines & pairs

most-used 5v5 units · when they played · on-ice xG
How to read this

The forward lines and defence pairs that actually played together most at 5v5, each with when it was on the ice across the game clock (period and power-play bands behind the strip) and on-ice xG against/for while the whole unit was out.

PHI
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
FORWARD LINESL1Sean CouturierOwen TippettMatvei Michkov9:16-0.47L2Garrett WilsonMichael BuntingNoel Acciari8:18-0.07L3Christian DvorakTrevor ZegrasTyson Foerster7:08-0.38L4Noah CatesDenver BarkeyPorter Martone5:06+0.14DEFENCE PAIRSD1Travis SanheimJamie Drysdale18:03-0.62D2Nick SeelerDavid Jiricek9:52-0.47D3Simon BenoitHelge Grans6:51-0.511ST2ND3RD011
BOS
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
FORWARD LINESL1David PastrnakPavel ZachaMorgan Geekie15:25+0.73L2Elias LindholmCasey MittelstadtJames Hagens9:42+1.05L3Tanner JeannotMark KastelicMatthew Poitras9:23-0.33L4JJ PeterkaMarat KhusnutdinovFraser Minten8:50+0.74DEFENCE PAIRSD1Connor CliftonNikita Zadorov18:55+0.81D2Hampus LindholmWilliam Borgen15:56+0.53D3Mason LohreiFrederic Brunet15:08+0.641ST2ND3RD01.251.25

Matchups

5v5 · every skater against every skater, goalies first · hover a cell
PHI won the chances BOS won them full colour = a margin of 0.75 xG or more taller = more time together (full height at 12:00) on together, dead even never on together G = goalie: his row or column is each skater against the whole other team
VladarCouturierTippettMichkovWilsonBuntingAcciariDvorakZegrasFoersterCatesBarkeyMartoneSanheimDrysdaleSeelerJiricekBenoitGransSwaymanPastrnakZachaGeekieLindholmMittelstadtHagensJeannotKastelicPoitrasPeterkaKhusnutdinovMintenCliftonZadorovLindholmBorgenLohreiBrunetGL1L2L3L4D1D2D3GL1L2L3L4D1D2D3
How to read this

Rows are PHI's skaters, columns BOS's, grouped the way they played: forward lines (L1 = the line that played together most), then defence pairs. Each cell covers the five-on-five time those two players shared the ice. Its colour is the club that out-chanced the other in that time — expected goals for minus against — and the stronger the colour, the bigger the margin. Each cell is also raised: the taller the block, the longer the two shared the ice, up to full height at 12:00 of five-on-five time. A grey cell means they met and it came out even; an open, flat one means they never met at five-on-five.

The first row and column are the goalies. A goalie is in net for every five-on-five second, so a skater's cell against the other side's goalie is all of that skater's five-on-five time against that team — the rest of his row or column added up — and the corner where the two goalies meet is the game's five-on-five. Those cells cover far more time than any pair, so they reach full colour sooner and stand at full height, a wall along each edge of the grid. A goalie change adds a second goalie row or column, each covering his own time.

Linemates share the ice, so a line against a line reads as a block. The margin is a total, not a rate: a long matchup has room to build a big gap and a thirty-second one does not — which is what the height is there to show: a tall, strong cell is the game's story; a short, strong one is a moment. Hover (or tap) any cell for the exact time together, the xG each way, attempts and goals. One game — a strong cell is what happened, not what would happen again.

Goals

xG = the chance, before it went in
TeamScorerPeriodTimexG
PHIPorter Martone 3rd6:32 PP 0.07
BOSPavel Zacha 1st12:21 0.04
BOSMason Lohrei 2nd17:12 0.08
BOSMarat Khusnutdinov 3rd1:55 0.17
BOSCasey Mittelstadt 3rd9:21 0.34
BOSFraser Minten 3rd15:59 0.06

The prediction, scored

Before puck drop the engine made BOS a 57.6% favorite, expecting a 2.60–3.06 game — BOS won 1–5, so the call landed. Every number in this section was issued before the game and is never re-graded.

pred. xGactual xG pred. 5v5actual 5v5 pred. STactual PP
PHI 2.601.14 1.660.95 0.730.12
BOS 3.063.13 2.563.05 0.450.00

Predicted 5v5 / special-teams portions come from the predicted map's strength splits (one shared scale per team pins the all-strengths total to its expected goals), so they don't sum exactly — the remainder is 4v4, 3v3, and other mixed states. The actual columns are the card's own counts (empty-net attempts excluded); the actual PP column is power-play xG only, the same bucket the predicted map's special-teams view draws.

The pregame score grid

The likeliest finals the engine saw before the game, with what actually happened marked — ■ PHI · ■ BOS.

Likeliest finals (PHI–BOS)probability
2–3 5.6%
2–2 5.5% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
3–3 4.9% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
3–2 4.8%
1–3 4.3%
1–5 2.0% what happened
7.4%4.7%019.3%14.4%125.1%22.0%221.8%22.4%314.1%17.1%47.4%10.5%53.2%5.3%61.2%2.3%70.5%1.3%8+

Scoreline odds treat the two teams' totals as independent — the engine's known simplification (it slightly under-counts regulation ties; the correlation term is registered v1.1 work). The OT/SO layer is a separate fitted model and is already inside the headline win probability.

The pregame read

The engine made BOS a 57.6% favorite — BOS controls 54.0% of the predicted xG. Of PHI's 2.60 expected goals, 1.66 should come at 5v5 and 0.73 on the power play; BOS projects 2.56 at 5v5 and 0.45 on the power play. The logistic challenger put the home side at 57.8%, Elo at 60.8%.

Where the engine expected the goals

The predicted surface, issued before puck drop — not this game's shots (those are the card's map above). PHI attacks the left net, BOS the right; each end multiplies where the attacking team generates xG this season by where its opponent concedes it, scaled so each end totals the engine's expected goals. Actual shots lays the game's unblocked attempts on top: × goals, • on net, ◦ missed.

Tale of the tape

How each team fares on its own, season to date: per-game xG rates with league rank (of 32). Rank 1 is best on every row — orange ranks sit in the top third of the league, gray in the bottom third.

PHIBOS
2.04 (31st) Offense
xG for / game
2.58 (25th)
3.78 (30th) Defense
xG against / game
2.70 (13th)
0.64 (22nd) Power play
PP xG / game
0.35 (31st)
0.73 (18th) Penalty kill
PP xG conceded / game
0.68 (15th)

Season-to-date form as of the site's latest build, shown for context — the ratings the engine actually used were its own as-of-game-day state. Replay this matchup in the lab →