xJawn NHL expected goals

← Games

Save a card: Summary · Full card · Game flow · VGK skaters · DET skaters · VGK lines · DET lines · Matchups
Final · Nov 5, 2026
2026-27 · regular season
The call
VGK 56.3% ✓
expected 3.03–2.66 · VGK won 2–1
actual xG
2.72–2.59
xG share, predicted → actual
VGK 53% → 51%47% → 49% DET
Today's puzzle Remember Some Guys — name the skater from the shape of his career. Three clues, one guess a day. Play →
On the ice
Adjusts with rink filters

Strength and score are read from VGK's side, the same minutes at both ends: PP = VGK power play · PK = DET power play · Leading = VGK ahead · ST = each club's own power play.

VGK attacks◀ all strengths
DET attacksall strengths ▶
× goal• on net ◦ missed· blocked hover any attempt for the shooter, its xG and everything the model saw
How to read this map

One rink, both teams: VGK attacks the left net, DET the right. Every attempt is a Gaussian bump of height = its model xG. The controls switch the surface (xG heatmap ↔ vs league) and the markers; vs league compares this game against a typical NHL team-game under the same filter (2026-27 regular season, 283 games), so a 5v5 view is measured against league 5v5.

A strength or score filter is read from VGK's side and mirrored for DET: “VGK PP” shows VGK's power-play attempts on the left and DET's shorthanded attempts on the right — the same minutes of the game at both ends. Empty-net attempts are excluded unless you include them. The Player control narrows the map and the rows beneath it to the attempts by either club while one player was on the ice (for a goalie, while he was in net); his own attempts wear a blue ring. vs league switches off while a player is picked — the league baseline is a whole team-game, which one player's slice is not. Hover any attempt for the shooter, the result, its xG, and the inputs behind it: clock, strength, score, shot type, distance, angle, handedness, rush/rebound, what happened just before, and the goalie or the blocker.

What each side produced

all strengths · this game
VGK DET
bars share a scale within each row · the longer bar is the row's leader
Goalson the map
2 1
Expected goals
2.72 2.59
xG%share of xG
51% 49%
High-dangerattempts ≥ 0.20 xG
1 3
Shots on goal
33 26
Attempts
59 59
xG by period · whole game 1st1.1–0.42nd0.7–1.23rd0.8–1.1

The Golden Knights beat the Red Wings 2–1 on the road in a game the chances called about even, VGK 2.7 to DET 2.6 in expected goals. The Red Wings power play made 0.9 xG on 9 attempts.

Counts come from the shot table behind the map: empty-net attempts and the shootout are excluded, so the goals here can trail the official final by an empty-netter or the shootout's deciding goal. Same numbers as the post-game cards.

As the game went

all situations · this game
cumulative VGK − DET xG · bands = power plays · lines = goals
1ST2ND3RD+0.5−0.5+1−1VGK AHEAD ▲DET AHEAD ▼
How to read this

One line: cumulative VGK minus DET expected goals. Above zero VGK is ahead on chances, below zero DET is. Shaded bands are power plays in the side's colour; vertical lines are goals.

Goals

this game
xG = the chance, before it went in
TeamScorerPeriodTimexG
VGKBraeden Bowman 3rd4:20 0.05
VGKTrevor Connelly 3rd18:18 0.07
DETAnton Johansson 3rd2:02 0.06
Who

Skaters

all · whole game · this game
on-ice xG for and against, his own attempts, the net
strength
period
sort
How to read this

Every skater: on-ice xG against to the left of zero, for to the right, his own attempts as the solid bar, a hash at the net. The slim track under the name is ice time. The chart opens sorted by net, best first; pick another key to re-order it, and click the same key again to flip it. A name opens the player's page. Pick a period and every bar re-lays for that period alone on the same scale as the whole game, so the three periods add up to it; a skater who did not play in it fades to the bottom.

VGK
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5220Mitch MarnerF23:24+0.82Victor OlofssonF14:08+0.37Tomas HertlF14:26+0.37Jeremy LauzonD14:35+0.32William KarlssonF18:35+0.28Ivan BarbashevF14:08+0.26Rasmus AnderssonD18:29+0.26Jack EichelF21:46+0.25Trevor ConnellyF11:19+0.16Brett HowdenF17:38+0.01Mark StoneF19:07-0.10Noah HanifinD18:53-0.11Dylan CoghlanD13:56-0.12Marc GatcombF8:11-0.22Nic DowdF9:37-0.26Braeden BowmanF12:58-0.30Shea TheodoreD24:04-0.33Brayden McNabbD21:35-0.34
0.50.5110Mitch MarnerF16:23+0.49Jack EichelF16:34+0.47Brayden McNabbD17:37+0.45Shea TheodoreD18:22+0.33Brett HowdenF14:04+0.29Jeremy LauzonD13:02+0.29Ivan BarbashevF13:30+0.26William KarlssonF14:10+0.22Mark StoneF13:46+0.17Rasmus AnderssonD16:31+0.14Victor OlofssonF9:44+0.08Tomas HertlF9:42+0.08Trevor ConnellyF10:15+0.04Dylan CoghlanD13:56-0.12Noah HanifinD17:19-0.14Nic DowdF8:42-0.22Marc GatcombF8:11-0.22Braeden BowmanF10:46-0.23
0.250.250.50.50.750.750Mitch MarnerF4:24+0.29Tomas HertlF4:13+0.29Jack EichelF4:10+0.29Victor OlofssonF4:09+0.29Mark StoneF3:56+0.29Braeden BowmanF1:21+0.12Rasmus AnderssonD1:05+0.12Trevor ConnellyF1:04+0.12William KarlssonF0:58+0.12Shea TheodoreD0:50+0.12
0.250.250.50.50.750.75110Noah HanifinD1:34+0.04Jeremy LauzonD1:33+0.04Mitch MarnerF1:32+0.03Nic DowdF0:55-0.03William KarlssonF1:33-0.06Braeden BowmanF0:51-0.18Brett HowdenF1:27-0.28Jack EichelF1:01-0.51Mark StoneF0:40-0.56Shea TheodoreD2:28-0.79Brayden McNabbD2:26-0.79
DET
against for own net ice time
0.50.5111.51.5220Alex DeBrincatF19:43+0.83Emmitt FinnieF21:27+0.74Viktor ArvidssonF17:25+0.73Lucas RaymondF22:13+0.49Andrew CoppF21:11+0.34Moritz SeiderD27:43+0.32Anton JohanssonD9:33+0.00Carter MazurF6:48-0.05Michael Brandsegg-NygårdF16:48-0.09Andreas EnglundD11:48-0.10Michael RasmussenF13:44-0.15Ben ChiarotD22:32-0.27Sheldon DriesF8:38-0.29Keegan KolesarF8:16-0.38Justin FaulkD22:43-0.46Nate DanielsonF10:53-0.60William WallinderD20:00-0.61J.T. CompherF15:00-0.64
0.250.250.50.50.750.75110Alex DeBrincatF15:35+0.27Emmitt FinnieF15:33+0.18Viktor ArvidssonF13:18+0.17Anton JohanssonD9:07+0.09Andreas EnglundD10:44+0.03Andrew CoppF16:16-0.01Carter MazurF6:48-0.05Keegan KolesarF6:36-0.05Sheldon DriesF5:50-0.05Lucas RaymondF17:06-0.08Justin FaulkD19:30-0.23William WallinderD17:50-0.24Michael Brandsegg-NygårdF15:35-0.27Michael RasmussenF10:19-0.29Moritz SeiderD19:43-0.33Ben ChiarotD19:26-0.35J.T. CompherF11:36-0.55Nate DanielsonF10:53-0.60
0.250.250.50.50.750.750Alex DeBrincatF2:36+0.57Viktor ArvidssonF2:35+0.57Lucas RaymondF2:34+0.57Emmitt FinnieF2:34+0.57Moritz SeiderD2:33+0.57Andrew CoppF1:26+0.28Justin FaulkD1:27+0.18Michael RasmussenF1:26+0.18J.T. CompherF1:25+0.18Michael Brandsegg-NygårdF1:13+0.18Ben ChiarotD0:11+0.00
0.250.250.50.50Moritz SeiderD3:02+0.08Ben ChiarotD2:55+0.08Andrew CoppF1:50+0.07Lucas RaymondF0:08+0.00Emmitt FinnieF1:18-0.01Michael RasmussenF1:36-0.05Anton JohanssonD0:26-0.09Andreas EnglundD1:04-0.14Sheldon DriesF1:55-0.24J.T. CompherF1:59-0.27Keegan KolesarF1:40-0.33William WallinderD1:17-0.36Justin FaulkD1:46-0.41

Lines & pairs

all · whole game · this game
most-used units · when they played · on-ice xG lines are by strength · 5v5 shown
strength
period
sort
How to read this

The units that actually played together most at the chosen strength — forward lines and defence pairs at 5v5, the whole group on the ice on the power play or the kill — each with when it was on the ice at that strength across the game clock (period and power-play bands behind the strip) and on-ice xG against / for while the whole unit was out, at that strength only. Sorted by time together; pick another key to re-order, and a name opens the player's page. Pick a period and the strip veils the rest of the game while the bars re-lay for that period alone, on the whole game's scale.

VGK
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF
DET
on ice power play penalty kill xGA xGF

Matchups

5v5 · this game
every skater against every skater, goalies first · hover a cell
order
VGK won the chances DET won them full colour = a margin of 0.75 xG or more taller = more time together (full height at 12:00) on together, dead even never on together G = goalie: his row or column is each skater against the whole other team
TarasovCoppRaymondBrandsegg-NygårdArvidssonDeBrincatFinnieCompherRasmussenDanielsonKolesarDriesMazurChiarotSeiderFaulkWallinderEnglundJohanssonGL1L2L3L4D1D2D3GL1L2L3L4D1D2D3HartStoneEichelHowdenKarlssonBarbashevMarnerDowdGatcombBowmanHertlOlofssonConnellyMcNabbTheodoreHanifinCoghlanAnderssonLauzon
How to read this

Rows are VGK's skaters, columns DET's, grouped the way they played: forward lines (L1 = the line that played together most), then defence pairs. Each cell covers the five-on-five time those two players shared the ice. Its colour is the club that out-chanced the other in that time — expected goals for minus against — and the stronger the colour, the bigger the margin. Each cell is also raised: the taller the block, the longer the two shared the ice, up to full height at 12:00 of five-on-five time. A grey cell means they met and it came out even; an open, flat one means they never met at five-on-five.

The first row and column are the goalies. A goalie is in net for every five-on-five second, so a skater's cell against the other side's goalie is all of that skater's five-on-five time against that team — the rest of his row or column added up — and the corner where the two goalies meet is the game's five-on-five. Those cells cover far more time than any pair, so they reach full colour sooner and stand at full height, a wall along each edge of the grid. A goalie change adds a second goalie row or column, each covering his own time.

Linemates share the ice, so a line against a line reads as a block. The margin is a total, not a rate: a long matchup has room to build a big gap and a thirty-second one does not — which is what the height is there to show: a tall, strong cell is the game's story; a short, strong one is a moment. Hover (or tap) any cell for the exact time together, the xG each way, attempts and goals. One game — a strong cell is what happened, not what would happen again.

The model

The prediction, scored

🔒 pregame · this game

Before puck drop the engine made VGK a 56.3% favorite, expecting a 3.03–2.66 game — VGK won 2–1, so the call landed. Every number in this section was issued before the game and is never re-graded.

pred. xGactual xG pred. 5v5actual 5v5 pred. STactual PP
VGK 3.032.72 1.991.96 0.810.64
DET 2.662.59 1.861.48 0.610.88

Predicted 5v5 / special-teams portions come from the predicted map's strength splits (one shared scale per team pins the all-strengths total to its expected goals), so they don't sum exactly — the remainder is 4v4, 3v3, and other mixed states. The actual columns are the card's own counts (empty-net attempts excluded); the actual PP column is power-play xG only, the same bucket the predicted map's special-teams view draws.

The pregame score grid

🔒 pregame · this game

The likeliest finals the engine saw before the game, with what actually happened marked — ■ VGK · ■ DET.

Likeliest finals (VGK–DET)probability
2–2 7.8% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
3–3 7.0% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
4–2 4.4%
3–1 4.4%
1–1 3.9% tied after regulation — OT/SO decides
2–1 2.8% what happened
4.9%7.1%014.7%18.7%122.1%24.6%222.1%21.7%316.9%14.5%410.4%7.8%55.3%3.5%62.3%1.4%71.3%0.6%8+

Scoreline odds are the engine's own grid: each team's goals as a Poisson count, with the fitted adjustment for how often games end tied after regulation (ρ = 0.35), so these odds and the headline win probability come from the same numbers. The OT/SO layer is a separate fitted model and is already inside the headline win probability.

The pregame read

🔒 pregame · this game

The engine made VGK a 56.3% favorite — DET controls 46.8% of the predicted xG. Of VGK's 3.03 expected goals, 1.99 should come at 5v5 and 0.81 on the power play; DET projects 1.86 at 5v5 and 0.61 on the power play. The logistic challenger put the home side at 41.2%, Elo at 50.5%.

Why VGK 56.3%
win chance× expected goals
5v5 play +9.4 VGK ×1.04 · DET ×0.86
home ice −3.3 VGK ×1.00 · DET ×1.08
finishing +2.2 VGK ×1.04 · DET ×0.99
goaltending −1.4 VGK ×0.97 · DET ×1.00
special teams +0.0 VGK ×1.00 · DET ×1.00
schedule −0.0 VGK ×0.99 · DET ×0.99

Win chance is in points toward VGK (bars right of the line push toward VGK, left toward DET). Each win-chance number is one-at-a-time: that piece reset to league average (neutral ice, a typical night's rest) on both sides and the game re-priced; the pieces interact, so they don't add up to the call. The multipliers are exact: a league-average team on neutral ice, on a typical night's rest, would expect 2.91 goals in this game, and each side's expected goals is that times its column of multipliers. Special teams reads small because the engine's power-play terms fit near zero, not because special teams don't matter.

Where the engine expected the goals

🔒 pregame · this game

The predicted surface, issued before puck drop — not this game's shots (those are the card's map above). VGK attacks the left net, DET the right; each end multiplies where the attacking team generates xG this season by where its opponent concedes it, scaled so each end totals the engine's expected goals. Actual shots lays the game's unblocked attempts on top: × goals, • on net, ◦ missed.

Context

Tale of the tape

season to date

How each team fares on its own, season to date: per-game xG rates with league rank (of 32). Rank 1 is best on every row — orange ranks sit in the top third of the league, gray in the bottom third.

VGKDET
3.09 (12th) Offense
xG for / game
3.10 (11th)
2.58 (5th) Defense
xG against / game
2.96 (16th)
0.76 (16th) Power play
PP xG / game
0.86 (7th)
0.50 (2nd) Penalty kill
PP xG conceded / game
0.83 (22nd)

Season-to-date form as of the site's latest build, shown for context — the ratings the engine actually used were its own as-of-game-day state. Replay this matchup in the lab →